Atlas Shagged

The Sex Pistol Who Is Wiser than Paul Wolfowitz

Remember when the newly minted head of the World Bank felt that he had to consult with Bono? Well

Sex Pistols singer John Lydon isn't impressed with Bono's political activism. The aging anarchist snarled to gigwise.com: "Every time I see Bono in those big fly glasses and tight leather pants I just can't hack it. I can't see that as solving the world's problems. He's crushing his testicles in tight trousers for world peace."

Gr0up this one with  Rod Stewart's diss of Sting as "Mister Serious who tries to help the Indians."

Link: Page Six.

Posted by Contrarius on Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 11:21 AM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Air America Rantings

For Stephanie Miller & Cindy Sheehan

On August 18th, 2005 Cindy Sheehan was on Stephanie Miller’s Air America radio show and Ms. Sheehan was talking about the support she has gotten for her quest to see the President (for a second time), and Stephanie was praising her and telling her she has put a human face on this issue, how strong and brave she is, etc.  Referring to the deaths of U.S. service personnel in Iraq Miller says, “These are not numbers, these are our children.  43 soldiers killed yesterday”.  When I heard this I nearly crashed my car.  Stop right there!  There were not 43 soldiers killed in Iraq the day before.  It was four!  Not forty three, four!  There were 43 Iraqis killed in suicide bomb blast in Baghdad on the 17th, but it was four Army soldiers killed in a roadside bomb attack in Samarra.  There is a huge difference between 43 and 4.

Continue reading "Air America Rantings" »

Posted by Spike on Tuesday, August 23, 2005 at 01:06 PM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Norman Mailer Blows Up (Again)

Norman Mailer has finally gone off the deep end about New York Times book critic Michiko Kakutani.   In a rant to Rolling Stone, Mailer rages:

Kakutani is a one-woman kamikaze. She disdains white male authors, and I'm her number-one favorite target. One of her cheap tricks is to bring out your review two weeks in advance of publication. She trashes it just to hurt sales and embarrass the author . . . But the Times' editors can't fire her. They're terrified of her. With discrimination rules and such, well, she's a threefer: Asiatic, feminist and, ah, what's the third? Well, let's just call her a twofer. They get two for one. She is a token. And, deep down, she probably knows it.

The Page Six gloss:

We think it's all a clever ploy by Mailer to ensure that Kakutani can't review his books again.

Link: New York Post Online Edition: gossip.

Posted by Contrarius on Monday, June 27, 2005 at 10:22 AM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Springtime for Dictators?

Bill Kristol gets off to a great start in the latest Weekly Standard:

NO ONE EVER THOUGHT IT would be easy to conquer the outposts of tyranny or to destroy the sponsors of terror. But it shouldn't be that hard, most of the time, to hold American foreign policy to some minimum standards: no rewards for gross acts of dictatorial oppression; no blind eye to facilitation of terrorism; no benign neglect for nuclear proliferation; no free passes for aiders and abettors of tyrants. Are we meeting those standards? Not as much as we should be, and not as much as we could be.

But it simply makes no sense to write a piece like this, getting all in a lather about the crushing of demonstrations "in the eastern Uzbek city of Andijon," without even mentioning China.

Posted by Contrarius on Wednesday, June 22, 2005 at 05:01 PM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Pin-up Girls

According to one Mr. Panero, "pinup girls belong on the nosecones of fighter planes and not on intellectual weblogs."  To whomever could he be referring?

Posted by Oi Lung on Wednesday, May 04, 2005 at 07:51 PM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Dispatch from Miami: Phil. Soc. 41st Meeting

Editor's Note: The exclusive Philadelphia Society, which the New York Times called  "a prestigious club for conservative intellectuals," had its forty-first annual meeting in Miami this past weekend. National Review, in its better days, reported on these events. Given the current state of NR, one of our operatives was there to report on the goings-on. Following is a recap of the proceedings.

The theme for this year's national meeting was "What is an American?", a subject given new currency because of Samuel Huntington's new book Who Are We: The Challenges to America's National Identity, as well as conservative outcry over accession of neocon Midge Decter to the presidency of the Society. Victoria Hughes, of the Bill of Rights Institute, was chosen as the new president for the upcoming year.

After the opening reception, the dinner's keynote speaker, Victor David Hanson, mounted an unsuccessful half-hour campaign to stimulate and amuse an unsurprisingly sympathetic audience. His target of opportunity was missed. In Who Killed Homer?, V.D.H. wrote in moving and elegiac prose about the rapidly declining interest in the classics among students at his university. Having sat through his speech, perhaps the problem wasn't with the students, but with V.D.H. himself. Indeed, the speech was a monotonous and derivative rehash of his earlier works on why American students have lost a sense of American identity. His answer to the problem? They should study more American history.

Saturday's luncheon was the highlight of the weekend. Lee Edwards, Philadelphia Society past president and the conservative movement's preeminet historian, introduced the venerable and legendary M. Stan Evans. Stan Evans is the Man. Evans is the founder of the National Journalism Center, whose alums include John Fund, Ann Coulter, and Michael Gladwell. His lunchtime talk was an extended meditation on "Evans' Law of Inadequate Paranoia," which reads: "No matter how bad you think something is, when you look at it, it’s always worse." (As an aside, other Evans maxims include "You can't always count on your friends, but you can always count on your enemies," "Once we get our people into power they stop being our people," and "I had no respect for Nixon until Watergate.")

Evans talked about his forthcoming book Blacklisted By History : The Real Story of Joseph McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies, which confirms and supplements everything in this book.

After lunch, a panel on immigration featured Prof. Andrew Yuengert of Pepperdine, Benjamin "Doogie Hoswer, Ph.D." Powell, and author Peter Brimelow. Brimelow is an English immigrant who warned against the dangers of immigration. Another panel called E Pluribus Unum featured Linda Chavez of the Center for Equal Opportunity, the cool and ever-entertaining Barry Shain of Colgate University, and rock-ribbed Old Right paleocon Prof. Forrest McDonald. (Interestingly, McDonald mentioned that Patrick Buchannan convinced Russel Kirk to become anti-immigration.) If anything, there was a notable lack of controversy among the panelists.

While attendance was not as big as for last year's fortieth anniversary celebration in Chicago, many regulars were present (Edward Hudgins, Washington Director of the Objectivist Center, Gene Meyer, Exec. Director of the Federalist Society, Linda Bridges of National Review, Timothy Goeglin, Special Assistant to the President--W's emissary to the Movement--Edwin Fuelner, President of the Heritage Foundation, and Ed Meese).

New faces included this year's Prom King and Queen of the Christian Right--the beautiful Michelle Rickert (the new Dean of Admissions at Liberty University Law School), and her cop-turned-academic husband Paul Rickert, Professor of Criminal Justice at Liberty University's [Jesse] Helms School of Government--and Hiro Aida, Washigton Bureau Chief of the Kyodo News.

Posted by Oi Lung on Monday, May 02, 2005 at 11:33 AM in Bitch-Slaps, Where's The Party? | Permalink | Comments (2)

The NRO Editors Bitch-Slapped!

Have the folks at NRO become a bit reflexive and paranoid in their in tribal pleading?  Here's the kind of thing they have actually been writing lately, which we follow with our own corrective.

Continue reading "The NRO Editors Bitch-Slapped!" »

Posted by Contrarius on Wednesday, April 13, 2005 at 10:10 AM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Open-Minded at Berkeley

From a gathering of the left's finest minds at Berkeley:

"The other thing that comes into sharp relief to me is that it is absolutely forbidden -- or should I say verboten -- in, in popular discourse in the United States to make any comparison to the United States to the Nazis. It's absolutely forbidden. They come down on you like a ton of bricks, you know. But I think when you actually look at it, when you add up all the bodies, all the people that suffered because of all the invasions, all the genocide, all the wars for domination, they far exceeded the Nazis. And people have to confront that. And we have to be part of, like, taking that out and fighting for that in society."

Right. Does anyone know who "they" are? I keep hearing about "them" coming down on lefties for speaking their minds, but I unfortunately don't notice any decrease in lefties speaking their minds. Whoever "they" are must not be doing a very good job of coming down like said ton of bricks. Crying shame, that.

Posted by Michael Kirkbride on Tuesday, April 12, 2005 at 11:55 AM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Krugman Bitch-Slapped!

Check out Cafe Hayek's take on Krugman's "ain't no science in them there Republicans" argument. Does anyone else remember when Krugman was actually somewhat focused? He even wrote a decent economics textbook once upon a time. LOST IT.

Posted by Michael Kirkbride on Wednesday, April 06, 2005 at 05:20 PM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Jonah Goldberg on Paul Krugman

The Maureen Dowd of the Right (we mean that in a good way) made his dog wait for the daily walk, so lathered up was he by Paul Krugman's column today.  The whole rebuttal is especially well written, even for Jonah, who's at his best when he's most impassioned.  He rightly stresses that that the ultra-Left guild/priesthood causes many prospective academics to quit in disgust.

But we stand by our earlier assessment: Krugman is onto something.  Too many conservatives just don't take ideas seriously.  Consider, for instance, William F. Buckley writing (in 1982) that ethics don't need to be debated because "everything important was already said by Christ in the Sermon on the Mount."  Or, Dinesh D'Souza writing a whole book about the "problem" of how to find Virtue in Prosperity, without deigning to mention that only with the arrival of Christianity did prosperity become problematic for virtue.  These are not the signs of open minds.

Posted by Contrarius on Tuesday, April 05, 2005 at 03:27 PM in Bitch-Slaps | Permalink

Next »